Bomb threats may be called in by a first-party for a third-party.

Bomb threats may be called in by a first-party for a third-party.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Not sure
• D. Both

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is that threat reporting is about the information and its source, not just who is supposedly affected. A caller can relay a bomb threat on behalf of someone else, making them a first party reporting for a third party. This matters because responders must capture who is making the report and who it concerns, so they can verify details, locate the threat, and assess risk. Therefore, the statement is true: a first party may call in a bomb threat for a third party, and you should treat the report seriously and collect key details like the third party’s identity (if known), the nature of the threat, location, time, and any specifics provided.

The main idea here is that threat reporting is about the information and its source, not just who is supposedly affected. A caller can relay a bomb threat on behalf of someone else, making them a first party reporting for a third party. This matters because responders must capture who is making the report and who it concerns, so they can verify details, locate the threat, and assess risk. Therefore, the statement is true: a first party may call in a bomb threat for a third party, and you should treat the report seriously and collect key details like the third party’s identity (if known), the nature of the threat, location, time, and any specifics provided.